Pradhan Mantri Adarsh Gram Yojana
1. Scheduled Castes (SCs), who constitute 16.6% of our population as per 2011 Census, have historically suffered social and educational disabilities and economic deprivation arising there from. Accordingly, special provisions have been enshrined in the Constitution for advancement of their interests. These provisions range from measures to remove any kind of social disabilities imposed on them to ensure equality of opportunity in every sphere, to measures of positive discrimination to bring them on par with rest of the population.
2. Article 46 of Part IV (“Directive Principles of State Policy”) of the Constitution enjoins upon the State to promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the people, in particular, of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes. Article 38 (2) in the same Part also enjoins upon the State to minimize inequities in income, and to endeavor to eliminate inequalities in status, facilities and opportunities, not only amongst individuals but also amongst groups of people residing in different areas or engaged in different vocations.
3. The Government has hence taken a number of initiatives for development of SCs, which have yielded positive outcomes, and have also resulted in narrowing the gap between the Scheduled Castes and the rest of the population. However, the focus of most welfare Schemes of SCs has been mainly cantered on individual beneficiaries rather than on the integrated development of SC pockets.
4. To enable an area based development approach, a new scheme called the Pradhan Mantri Adarsh Gram Yojana (PMAGY) was launched on a Pilot basis during 2009-10, following the Finance Minister’s declaration in his Budget Speech delivered on 6.7.2009. The Scheme aims at integrated development of villages in which the population of Scheduled Castes is above 50%. A total of 1000 villages from Tamil Nadu (225), Rajasthan (225), Bihar (225), Himachal Pradesh (225) and Assam (100) were selected for the Pilot phase.
5. During 2014-15, PMAGY was further extended (Phase-I) to cover another 1500 villages across 11 States namely Andhra Pradesh (7), Assam (75), Chhattisgarh (175), Jharkhand (100), Haryana (12), Karnataka (201), Madhya Pradesh (327), Odisha (175), Punjab (162), Telangana (6) and Uttar Pradesh (260).
Expansion of the Scheme:
6. In light of the benefits accruing to the residents of the villages through successful implementation of the Scheme, it has been decided to take up more villages in the Phase-II. All those districts are considered which have villages having total population ≥500 and with more than 50% persons belonging to the Scheduled Castes. Up to 10 such villages in descending order of SC population are proposed to be selected from each such district for implementation of the Scheme in this new Phase.
Revision of Scheme Guidelines:
7. To ensure all round development of the selected villages, so that they can indeed become ‘Adarsh Grams’, the said Scheme has been recently revised to capture the Gaps in critical socio-economic ‘Monitorable Indicators’ as part of various sectors/domains. These domains include water and sanitation, education, health and nutrition, agricultural best practices etc. amongst others.
New Approach for implementation:
8. The identification of needs or Gaps with regard to the ‘Monitor able Indicators’ will be based on a Need Assessment exercise. The ‘Village Development Plan’ (VDP) will be based on the data collected as part of the Need Assessment exercise. The Scheme relies heavily on convergence with other initiatives of the Central and State Governments for ensuring that the minimum infrastructure and critical services are made available to all the persons in the village, especially those belonging to the Scheduled Castes. PMAGY will provide the platform for convergent implementation of other Schemes with the aim to achieve saturation in the variousdomains. Whereas it is expected that the major portion of the funds requirement for implementation would be met from other Central or State Schemes, the ‘Gap-filling’ funds will be provided under the Scheme, for those areas which cannot be covered otherwise.
Funding under the Scheme:
9. For every new village selected, the Scheme provides for a total of Rs. 21 lakh of which Rs.20.00 lakh is for the ‘Gap-filling’ component and Rs.1.00 lakh is meant for ‘administrative expenses’ at the Centre, State, District and Village level in the ratio of 1:1:1:2. Initially, 50% of the admissible grant i.e. Rs.10.40 lakh per new village (including Rs. 10 lakh for ‘Gap-filling’ and Rs. 40, 000 for ‘administrative expenses’) will be released to the State Govt. either through PMAGY or through the infrastructure component of the Scheme of SCA to SCSP, or both. The remaining 50% of funds for the new villages would be released after due appraisal by the Central PMAGY Steering-cum-Monitoring Committee and only after reasonable physical and financial progress is achieved.
10. In addition to the newly selected villages, villages already implementing PMAGY in Phase-I will also receive an additional round of funding so that they are also able to achieve the desired goals for the socio- economic indicators now specified under the new Scheme Guidelines, provided they meet the revised eligibility criteria. For these villages, the Scheme provides for a total of Rs. 10 lakh of which Rs. 9.50 lakh is for the ‘Gap-filling’ component and Rs. 0.50 lakh is for ‘administrative expenses’ at the Centre, State, District and Village level in the ratio of 1:1:1:2.
11. Details of ‘funding’ and ‘flow of fund’ are explained at para-9 and 10 of the Scheme Guidelines. The State Government/UT Administration would initially release the funds to the District Administrations for, ‘administrative expenses’ i.e. for capacity building, awareness generation, preparation of the ‘Village Development Plans’ (VDPs) and initiating other non-cost based activities. The funds under the ‘Gap-filling’ component are to be released to the District Administration only after approval of the VDPs of the selected villages by the District PMAGY Convergence Committee and thereafter the District Administration can release funds to the Gram Panchayats or line departments for execution of the identified infrastructure works under VDP.
Project Monitoring:
12. The Scheme provides for setting up of various levels of Committees for guidance, monitoring and implementation. These Committees, especially the Convergence Committees at the Village, District and State levels, are crucial to the implementation as they would assess the requirements as well as plan and execute the works/services that are needed to be undertaken under various Schemes for the wholesome development of the villages. Selection of Villages under Phase-II of the Scheme and release of Fund:
13. The list of States/UTs in their descending order of their SC population as well as no. of villages eligible for funding under Phase-II as per revised norms of the scheme are as under:
|
Sl. No.
|
State
|
SC
Population
|
Ten village per district
taken under the Scheme under Phase-II
|
Fund Required (in Rs. Lakh)
|
| Phase-I
|
New
|
Total
|
Phase-I
|
New
|
Total
|
|
1
|
Uttar Pradesh
|
413, 57, 608
|
49
|
675
|
724
|
490
|
14175
|
14665
|
|
2
|
West Bengal
|
214, 63, 270
|
0
|
210
|
210
|
0
|
4410
|
4410
|
|
3
|
Bihar
|
165, 67, 325
|
0
|
348
|
348
|
0
|
7308
|
7308
|
|
4
|
Tamil Nadu
|
144, 38, 445
|
0
|
271
|
271
|
0
|
5691
|
5691
|
|
5
|
Maharashtra
|
132, 75, 898
|
0
|
145
|
145
|
0
|
3045
|
3045
|
|
6
|
Rajasthan
|
122, 21, 593
|
0
|
288
|
288
|
0
|
6048
|
6048
|
|
7
|
Madhya Pradesh
|
113, 42, 320
|
67
|
333
|
400
|
670
|
6993
|
7663
|
|
8
|
Karnataka
|
104, 74, 992
|
25
|
239
|
264
|
250
|
5019
|
5269
|
|
9
|
Punjab
|
88, 60, 179
|
57
|
161
|
218
|
570
|
3381
|
3951
|
|
10
|
Andhra Pradesh
|
84, 45, 398
|
4
|
99
|
103
|
40
|
2079
|
2119
|
|
11
|
Orissa
|
71, 88, 463
|
83
|
192
|
275
|
830
|
4032
|
4862
|
|
12
|
Telangana
|
54, 09, 000
|
5
|
133
|
138
|
50
|
2793
|
2843
|
|
13
|
Haryana
|
51, 13, 615
|
11
|
137
|
148
|
110
|
2877
|
2987
|
|
14
|
Gujarat
|
40, 74, 447
|
0
|
25
|
25
|
0
|
525
|
525
|
|
15
|
Jharkhand
|
39, 85, 644
|
44
|
129
|
173
|
440
|
2709
|
3149
|
|
16
|
Chhattisgarh
|
32, 74, 269
|
10
|
128
|
138
|
100
|
2688
|
2788
|
|
17
|
Kerala
|
30,39,573
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
21
|
21
|
|
18
|
Assam
|
22, 31, 321
|
35
|
238
|
273
|
350
|
4998
|
5348
|
|
19
|
Uttarakhand
|
18, 92, 516
|
0
|
124
|
124
|
0
|
2604
|
2604
|
|
20
|
Himachal Pradesh
|
17, 29, 252
|
0
|
90
|
90
|
0
|
1890
|
1890
|
|
21
|
Jammu and Kashmir
|
9, 24, 991
|
0
|
71
|
71
|
0
|
1491
|
1491
|
|
22
|
Tripura
|
6, 54, 918
|
0
|
31
|
31
|
0
|
651
|
651
|
|
23
|
Puducherry
|
1, 96, 325
|
0
|
10
|
10
|
0
|
210
|
210
|
|
24
|
Manipur
|
97, 328
|
0
|
12
|
12
|
0
|
252
|
252
|
|
25
|
Meghalaya
|
17,355
|
0
|
4
|
4
|
0
|
84
|
84
|
|
TOTAL
|
390
|
4, 094
|
4, 484
|
3900
|
85974
|
89874
|
14. Fund Released under Phase-II of the Scheme:
|
Sl. No.
|
State
|
No of Villages for which fund released/being released
|
Fund Released/being released
|
Remarks
|
|
Phase
-I
|
New
|
Total
|
Phase- I
|
New
|
Total
|
|
1
|
Uttar Pradesh
|
37
|
328
|
365
|
366.3
|
3411.2
|
3777.5
|
SCA to SCSP*
|
|
2
|
West Bengal
|
0
|
105
|
105
|
0.0
|
1092.0
|
1092.0
|
&
|
|
3
|
Bihar
|
0
|
181
|
181
|
0.0
|
1882.4
|
1882.4
|
&
|
|
4
|
Tamil Nadu
|
0
|
144
|
144
|
0.0
|
1497.6
|
1497.6
|
PMAGY*
|
|
5
|
Maharashtra
|
0
|
91
|
91
|
0.0
|
946.4
|
946.4
|
PMAGY*
|
|
6
|
Rajasthan
|
0
|
148
|
148
|
0.0
|
1539.2
|
1539.2
|
MCC
|
|
7
|
Madhya Pradesh
|
|
180
|
226
|
|
1872.0
|
2327.4
|
MCC
|
| 46
|
|
455.4
|
|
MCC
|
|
8
|
Karnataka
|
|
125
|
137
|
|
1300.0
|
1419.0
|
PMAGY*
|
| 12
|
|
119.0
|
|
SCA to SCSP*
|
|
9
|
Punjab
|
|
76
|
110
|
|
790.4
|
1127.0
|
PMAGY*
|
| 34
|
|
336.6
|
|
SCA to SCSP#
|
|
10
|
Andhra Pradesh
|
3
|
53
|
56
|
29.7
|
551.2
|
580.9
|
SCA to SCSP*
|
|
11
|
Orissa
|
55
|
92
|
147
|
544.5
|
956.8
|
1501.3
|
SCA to SCSP*
|
|
12
|
Telangana
|
5
|
90
|
95
|
49.5
|
936.0
|
985.5
|
MCC
|
|
13
|
Haryana
|
8
|
85
|
93
|
79.2
|
884.0
|
963.2
|
|
|
14
|
Gujarat
|
0
|
25
|
25
|
0.0
|
260.0
|
260.0
|
PMAGY*
|
|
15
|
Jharkhand
|
23
|
79
|
102
|
227.7
|
821.6
|
1049.3
|
|
|
16
|
Chhattisgarh
|
7
|
70
|
77
|
69.3
|
728.0
|
797.3
|
MCC
|
|
17
|
Kerala
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0.0
|
10.4
|
10.4
|
PMAGY*
|
|
18
|
Assam
|
|
134
|
151
|
|
1393.6
|
1561.9
|
PMAGY*
|
| 17
|
|
168.3
|
|
SCA to SCSP**
|
|
19
|
Uttarakhand
|
0
|
65
|
65
|
0.0
|
676.0
|
676.0
|
|
|
20
|
Himachal Pradesh
|
0
|
47
|
47
|
0.0
|
488.8
|
488.8
|
&
|
|
21
|
Jammu and Kashmir
|
0
|
38
|
38
|
0.0
|
395.2
|
395.2
|
PMAGY*
|
|
22
|
Tripura
|
0
|
26
|
26
|
0.0
|
270.4
|
270.4
|
SCA to SCSP*
|
|
23
|
Puducherry
|
0
|
5
|
5
|
0.0
|
52.0
|
52.0
|
|
|
24
|
Manipur
|
0
|
12
|
12
|
0.0
|
124.8
|
124.8
|
PMAGY**
|
|
25
|
Meghalaya
|
0
|
4
|
4
|
0.0
|
41.6
|
41.6
|
|
| TOTAL
|
247
|
2, 204
|
2, 451
|
2445.3
|
22921.6
|
25366.9
|
|
Progress of Pilot Phase:
15. Physical and Financial Progress during Pilot Phase of the Scheme:
Sl
|
State
|
No. of selected villages
|
No of Works Approved
|
No of Works completed
|
No of Villages declared ‘Adarsh
Gram’
|
Total Fund Released (Rs. In Cr.)
|
UC
Submitted
|
| 1
|
Assam
|
100
|
|
|
100
|
20.10
|
20.10
|
| 2
|
Bihar
|
225
|
3721
|
3162
|
23
|
45.225
|
45.225
|
| 3
|
Himachal Pradesh
|
225
|
|
|
44
|
45.255
|
45.15
|
| 4
|
Rajasthan
|
225
|
1334-61
|
1273
|
225
|
45.255
|
45.15
|
| 5
|
Tamil Nadu
|
225
|
|
|
225
|
45.225
|
45.15
|
|
Total
|
1000
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
Progress of Phase-I:
16. Physical and Financial Progress during Phase-I of the Scheme:
|
Sl
|
State
|
No of Villages selected under Phase-I
|
| By Dept.
|
Under Discretion
|
Redistributed
|
Total
|
|
1
|
Assam
|
75
|
|
|
75
|
|
2
|
Uttar Pradesh
|
200
|
10
|
50
|
260
|
|
3
|
Madhya Pradesh
|
200
|
77
|
50
|
327
|
|
4
|
Karnataka
|
200
|
1
|
|
201
|
|
5
|
Punjab
|
100
|
12
|
50
|
162
|
|
6
|
Odisha
|
100
|
|
75
|
175
|
|
7
|
Jharkhand
|
100
|
|
|
100
|
|
8
|
Chhattisgarh
|
100
|
|
75
|
175
|
|
9
|
Haryana
|
|
12
|
|
12
|
|
10
|
Andhra Pradesh
|
|
7
|
|
7
|
|
11
|
Telangana
|
|
6
|
|
6
|
|
TOTAL
|
1075
|
125
|
300
|
1500
|
| Sl
|
State
|
Central Assistance Released (Rs. Cr)
|
Matching Share
|
| 14-15
|
15-16
|
16-17
|
17-18
|
18-19
|
Total
|
|
1
|
Assam
|
|
|
15.75
|
|
|
15.75
|
|
|
2
|
Uttar Pradesh
|
1.00
|
42.00
|
1.10
|
8.65
|
1.85
|
54.60
|
|
|
3
|
Madhya Pradesh
|
7.70
|
47.32
|
3.15
|
10.50
|
|
68.67
|
|
|
4
|
Karnataka
|
0.10
|
40.00
|
2.11
|
|
|
42.21
|
|
|
5
|
Punjab
|
18.70
|
3.50
|
1.32
|
16.10
|
|
39.62
|
5.60
|
|
6
|
Odisha
|
|
21.00
|
15.75
|
|
|
36.75
|
|
|
7
|
Jharkhand
|
|
21.00
|
|
|
|
21.00
|
|
|
8
|
Chhattisgarh
|
|
21.00
|
20.75
|
3.75
|
|
45.50
|
8.75
|
|
9
|
Haryana
|
1.20
|
|
1.32
|
|
|
2.52
|
|
|
10
|
Andhra Pradesh
|
0.70
|
|
0.77
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
|
11
|
Telangana
|
0.60
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
1.26
|
|
| Total
|
30.00
|
195.82
|
62.68
|
39.00
|
1.85
|
329.35
|
14.35
|
| Sl
|
State
|
Physical and Financial Progress
|
Expendit ure
(Rs. Cr.)
|
| No of Villages
|
VDP
Prepare d
|
Works Appd.
|
Works comple ted
|
Works in
Progres s
|
Villages declared
Adarsh Gram
|
|
1
|
Assam
|
75
|
68
|
58
|
0
|
58
|
0
|
0
|
|
2
|
Uttar Pradesh
|
260
|
210
|
775
|
13
|
367
|
140
|
32.02
|
|
3
|
Madhya Pradesh
|
327
|
251
|
2018
|
386
|
398
|
0
|
21.25
|
|
4
|
Karnataka
|
201
|
199
|
102
|
0
|
78
|
0
|
40.10
|
|
5
|
Punjab
|
162
|
105
|
677
|
101
|
557
|
0
|
21.09
|
|
6
|
Odisha
|
175
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
7
|
Jharkhand
|
100
|
100
|
1120
|
0
|
1120
|
0
|
0
|
|
8
|
Chhattisgarh
|
175
|
175
|
2025
|
62
|
1857
|
0
|
41.75
|
|
9
|
Haryana
|
12
|
9
|
18
|
2
|
16
|
0
|
0
|
|
10
|
Andhra Pradesh
|
7
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
11
|
Telangana
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Total
|
1500
|
1117
|
6793
|
564
|
4451
|
140
|
156.21
|
17. Financial Year wise releases are given below:
|
Year
|
Budget Allocation (Rs. In Crore)
|
Expenditure (Rs. In Crore)
|
|
Up to 2013-14
|
–
|
201.00
|
|
2014-15
|
30.00
|
30.00
|
|
2015-16
|
200.00
|
195.82
|
|
2016-17
|
90.00
|
62.68
|
|
2017-18
|
40.00
|
39.00
|
|
2018-19
(Till 14-11-2018)
|
70.00
|
65.94
|
|
Total
|
594.44
|
